Saturday, 26 July 2014

Never Mind by Edward St Aubyn

Buy it from Hive.co.uk and support local booksellers 


Edward St Aubyn was recently interviewed on BBC Culture Show (well perhaps not that recently but we only recently got around to watching it...).

Never Mind is the first in a sequence of novels that follow the life of Patrick Melrose, it is also based on the events of Edward St Aubyn's own life.

This rises very interesting questions about the relationship between the fiction of Melrose and the reality of St Aubyn. In the Culture Show interview St Aubyn clearly states that some passages are direct accounts of the events that he actually experienced, but much, perhaps most, of the novel Never Mind tells of events which are happening beyond the experience of the 5 year old Melrose, and therefore it would seem are imagined by St Aubyn rather than recalled.

To draw attention to this relationship is not to make a judgement – that St Aubyn has “made up” most of the novel does not devalue it, nor does it lessen its status as a “truthful” account, but it reminds us that too often we operate with an overly simplistic definition of a “true story”.

Patrick Melrose in fact plays a fairly small part in the novel – and if it was not for the priming by the Culture Show that these that the “Patrick Melrose” novels I think I might well have overlooked him entirely (much as the rest of the characters in the novel clearly disregard him) and I certainly wouldn't have come to the conclusion that it was a book “about” him...

This is a short book, just under 200 pages, and that was a good thing, as it is populated with a cast of dislikeable individuals, which in interaction with each other seem only to emphasis one another's failings. There is the sense that if I had not read it in a single sitting I would not have brought myself back to it, I would have had little desire to reacquaint myself with this menagerie of human brokenness.

Friday, 25 July 2014

To Play the King by Michael Dobbs

Buy it from Hive.co.uk and support local booksellers 


It is interesting that this second “Urquhart” novel was writing after the TV adaptation of the first, and as such, for example, it takes up the story from the conclusion of the TV version of House of Cards rather than the book (they have significantly different endings), and of course it includes Urquhart's catch phrase “you may think that, I couldn't possibly comment” which is absent from the first book.

The dynamics of the story line remain fresh, but one wonders if what counted as career destroying scandal then retains its relevance today. There is an increasing ability for senior figures to remain in post amid media storms, or if they do resign, discover there is a revolving door that brings them back into Government after an interval (some have even managed to use such a door on more than one occasion).

The one aspect that did have a potent contemporary ring was the minor character “the Member for Dagenham”. That the police, having found him in a compromising position would an under-age boy, check in with the Home Secretary before taking formal action and as a result no action is taken as it would hit a wafer thin Government majority. This is a fiction, but with the current wave of historic abuse scandals it is clear that it is not fantasy.

In the early 90s Michael Dobbs. as an establishment insider, could include that sub-plot and no one batted an eyelid – we weren't shocked, no one asked Dobbs who was the inspiration, whether the police really did take such cues from Goverment etc etc.

I am not suggesting Dobbs needs to be held accountable for anything, but it is interesting to notice how society's attitude to addressing the issue of sexual abuse has moved dramatically in relatively recent years.

Monday, 7 July 2014

House of Cards by Michael Dobbs

Buy it from Hive.co.uk and support local booksellers 


While I am aware of the TV adaptation of these novels I have never actually watched them – they are one of those cultural phenomena that you have acquired by osmosis rather than active participation.

Reading this directly upon finishing Archbishop it was clear that this was one of the novels that was buried within Guinness's voluminous work – her Archbishop of York is Dobbs's Urguhart. Unfortunately the close comparison did nothing to flatter Guinness.

Setting that aside, the drama of the tale takes you along, and I think post phone hacking and expenses scandals the scenario is both as relevant and as believable as ever. That it holds up 25 years after publication is a credit to Dobbs.

Awaiting delivery of the sequel...

Faith Maps by Michael Paul Gallagher

Buy it from Hive.co.uk and support local booksellers 


This is a slightly odd book and I struggled with the first half, but just at the point of abandonment suddenly a new connection was made and it seemed to open up and begin to really resonant with me.

Gallagher has selected 10 “Religious Explorers”, a personal, indeed eccentric even, grouping of individuals – but they would certainly make for a lively dinner party...

This is a (post) modern Catholic list, the earliest explorer is JH Newman, the most recent Pope Benedict XVI, and so while that title is “Faith Maps” plural, I would suggest the gathering is actually constituted to argue for a “Faith Map” singular – it is the commonality not the diversity of these “Explorers” that we are encouraged to dwell upon.

In my view a good book is a book that sends you off in search of others, and this one has done that. One of the “eccentric” aspects is the inclusion of Flannery O'Connor, a writer of fiction not theology, and I am now mid-way through reading a complete collection of her short stories, (I will leave comment on her till I have finished that collection).

The other eccentricity is that most, but not all, the chapters are in two parts, first a standard synopsis of the writer thought, the second a monologue written in “their voice”. The question is how one is meant to orientate oneself to these imagined monologues, they perhaps help to make some of the more abstract thoughts of the writers be re-communicated in more accessible form, but fundamentally any suggestion that they offer authentic expression the writers thought is difficult. There are interesting, but undeniably it is Gallagher who is speaking in these monologues.

The essence of this “Faith Map” is that there is something more that the rational that is essential to faith. It is a critique of the failure of engagement with Modernity by Christianity, it is a great weakness of Christianity today that it is overly informed by a “Modern” mind set.

Last weekend I was at a Two:23 event where Ian Mobsby was speaking and giving an over view of his particular take on Fresh Expressions. Gallagher's “Faith Map” is I think very close to Mobsby's, and in particular Gallagher's account of Benedict XVI's thought seemed to mirror Mobsby very closely even if I am not sure either Mobsby or Benedict would be entirely comfortable to find themselves such close bed fellows (titter ye not!).

To quote from p 142 “And Pope Benedict went on to make an imaginative proposal: “I think that today too the Church should open a sort of 'Courtyard of the Gentiles' in which people might in some way latch on to God, within knowing him and before gaining access to his mystery”.” It would seem that Moot, the community Mobsby helps to lead, is a sort of Courtyard of the Gentiles.
The message is that is not faith or the Gospel that get in people's way, but “the Church”, both its reality and their imagined construct of it. We need to communicated the distinction between the two and allow people a route through (or around) the church and into faith.

Friday, 4 July 2014

Archbishop by Michele Guinness

Buy it from Hive.co.uk and support local booksellers 


Clearly this is a novel written in a moment – the tale of the first female Archbishop can probably only be told at this moment when it is about to become a possibility yet is not yet a reality – because in the gap between the two there is room for fiction and fantasy.

This is a big book, close to 550 pages, but it is pretty light...

There are some inaccuracies which limit the ability to lose yourself in the story – for example the conversation between the Archbishop and the Queen, in which the Queen uses the “Royal We” which she doesn't do even really use in formal public settings and it shatters the supposedly cosy intimacy of these encounters. Also in a similar way in which even close colleagues refer to here as “Vicar”, “Bishop”, and latterly “Archbishop” is really rather outdated. Also it seems highly unlikely that anyone makes it through Theological College with their virginity intact, and here was probably the moment when I lost any ability to believe in Vicky Burnham-Woods as a character.

There are other questions too. Does the Archbishop really have the power and influence the plot requires? Are the “scandals” which shape the story line really scandalous enough to drive the plot?

I think the novel tries to do too much – there is one story about power and ambition (and the corrupting effects of both), another about gender dynamics, another about the invasion of privacy in our celebrity culture, one about religion freedom and the place of faith in the public square, to name but a few, and they are all competing for our attention and getting muddled up in the process. Perhaps Guinness should have been encouraged to develop this material into two, or three, shorter novels, each with a more distinct focus and identity.