This is a beautiful
book, for Advent, with rich illustrations, and words carefully
crafted. It is attentive to the natural world, each day a different
animal is encountered, and in the encounter the divine glimpsed. A
great resource for those keeping Advent, but one which would speak to
you even if Christianity was absolutely not your tradition. A little
gem :-)
Saturday, 11 February 2017
Friday, 10 February 2017
Tales of the Shopocracy by John Barnie
This is a tale of a
family, “A portrait” of the writer's Father, biography rather
than hagiography. That it is a portrait of his Father rather than
his Mother when both feature equally in the narrative is because it
is also an exploration John Barnie's masculinity. Within the
Shopocracy there seemed to be a clear definition of what it was to be
a man, for John roles were more fluid.
He finds that while
on the surface his Father, and forefathers, conformed to societal
expectations they were in their quite ways independent souls. That
some of his rebellions were in fact conforming to type, he was more
of a chip off the old block than he had imagined.
I found this a
familiar trait, coming from a family that on face value is firmly
bourgeoisie, and yet often at the outer edges of subversion. This
quote perhaps sums it up “I have most sympathy with Anarchism,
though I have no illusions that it could be made to work. In a
democracy, if you vote a party into power, you have immediately to
join the opposition.”
The Immortalization Commission by John Gray
I found this a
fascinating book at a number of different levels. It has the
sub-title “Science and the Strange Quest to Cheat Death” a topic
it treats in two halves. The first is about a range of Victorian and
early Twentieth century spiritualists, the second about certain
movements with the Soviet Union.
With the
“spiritualists” the focus is on their attempts to communicate
with the dead. They are an eccentric group of people, but perhaps
typical of a segment of the upper middle classes in that era. John
Gray goes through the various ways in which their investigations
failed.
However for the most
part it would appear these were not charlatan, when they reported
receiving messages they were not, consciously, making things up.
There was instead at play a rich mix of over-interpretation of
phenomena and the power of sub-conscious suggestion. Gray points to
the fact that the ways in which the sub-conscious was at play might
actually be more interesting area of enquiry than if they had been
genuinely getting messages from beyond the grave.
We are familiar with
the phrase that History is written by the winners, but what I found
particularly interesting is the way that this story shows that
science too is written by the winners. Whether you go down as a
visionary pioneer or a deluded alchemist is probably more down to
luck than genius. Certainly in the period under examination, an era
when science was still the domain of the educated amateur many of our
scientific heroes lived lives of even greater eccentricity than those
recalled here by Gray.
There is quiet a jump to the second half and the settling of the
Soviet Union in the inter-war years. Communism would claim to be
over-turn the world of religion and superstition in favour of
science. It is strange to think of the Soviet Union as a place
looking for immortality in a period when famines and political purges
between them took the lives of millions. There was a strong trend
toward eugenics, that many died was unproblematic if it gave greater
opportunity for “the strong” to flourish. But also stripped of
religious, or other beliefs, the human being was reduced to a
machine. To be used and when broken down discarded. This was a fact,
not a cause for moralising or sentiment.
While
Gray is not an advocate for religion he is equally sceptical about
the idolisation of “Science”.He says at one point that “if we
know anything it is that most of the theories that prevail at anyone
time are false.” I think there was once an episode of QI which was
make up entirely of questions which had featured in earlier series,
but for which new discoveries had in the intervening years invalidate
the answer first given. “Scientific facts” are always
provisional, waiting for the exception that remakes the theory
It
is easy to look but and see others a deluded, but looking around and
there are plenty of behaviours that continue to seek to “Cheat
Death” The Soviet's embalmed Lenin's corpse, with Botox increasing
number are embalmed themselves. And there is a downbeat about Gray's
writing, we seem to find a way to turn every scientific advance into
a weapon of some kind, from atom bombs to cyber attacks. He writes
“None of this is the fault of science; what it shows is that
science is not sorcery. The growth of knowledge enlarges what humans
can do. It cannot reprieve them from being what they are.”
He
ends by saying “The afterlife is like utopia, a place where no one
wants to live. Without seasons nothing ripens and drops to the
ground, the leaves never change their colours or the sky its vacant
blue. Nothing dies, so nothing is born. … Seekers after immortality
look for a way out of chaos; but they are part of that chaos, natural
or divine. Immortality is only the dimming soul projected on to a
blank screen.” when he could equally have concluded by quoting
Ecclesiastes 3.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)