Buy it from Bookshop.org and support local booksellers
THIS CONTAINS
SPOILERS
This is a powerful
narrative, a felt the weight of the unreconciled relationships within
it, although only a little over two hundred pages I found I had to
read it over a number of days to prevent the sorrow it brought up
within me becoming overwhelming, it left me punch drunk.
Set in 1980s Poland
the context of a creaking Communist regime heightens some of the
challenges of finding an identity as a gay man, but within the
particularity of this story there are many themes that were all too
familiar.
What Jedrowski
writes about Giovanni’s Room can also be said of his own work “If
felt as if the words and the thoughts of the narrator – despite
their agony, despite their pain – healed some of my agony and my
pain, simply by existing.” (p51)
Ludwik as narrator
addresses his recollections to “you”, Janusz, and this had the
effect of drawing me as reader into the heart of it. For much of the
Janusz is not a sympathetic character, Ludwik is hurting and it is
Janusz’s actions (and inactions) that are the, immediate, cause of
that pain so it is uncomfortable to find yourself, as reader, cast in
that role.
As they negotiate
their relationship…
...The water
pipes churned with a low thud, and I felt a heaviness settle over me.
“And you want
to live like that, Janusz, in fear?”
You laughed, your
confidence in place again. “I’m not afraid. We just need to mind
our own business. Avoid risks, be smart. As long as we do that, we’ll
be fine. Don’t you think?”
I shrugged,
feeling defeated. (p108)
It is a theme that
was in Proud of Me by Sarah Hagger-Holt – we move from holding our
sexuality as a secret to holding it privately yet we are still not
really living openly – at different levels we edit our lives for
public consumption, this is not a uniquely LGBT+ exercise by any
means – but I caught myself just this week talking to a colleague
at work without giving the gender of my partner, I have a “coffee
roulette” in a couple of weeks with someone from another part of
the organisation and I don’t know if I will “come out” to them.
It is an oppressive drip-drip-drip, that place at the back of your
mind that is held ready to deal with a negative reaction.
The power of the
state to discriminate is expressed in chilling terms “One day your
country is yours, and the next it isn’t.” (p81) – anytime we
allow a division between those that have rights and those that do not
have rights we open the door to oppression – it becomes the moment we
look upon two human beings and strip one of dignity.
The passage towards
the end of the book (p203) when Ludwik has applied for a passport and
is pressured to disclosure names of other homosexuals is so corrosive
– someone else has given his name – do we see that as an act of
betrayal, Ludwik doesn’t appear to blame the individual – it is
not the individual but the system that has betrayed him, but there
must be some role for personal responsibility and moral courage in
the face of oppression even if we chose to judge kindly those faced
with impossible decisions.
Janusz compromises
with the state, and society, and marries Hania, meanwhile Ludwik
leaves for America but needs Hania’s party connection to get his
passport. It is a bitter moment, feels like Winston Smith giving in
to Big Brother – whatever liberty Ludwik finds in America it is at
the gift of the Party that he is escaping.
While earlier in the
novel you are tempted to make lazy moral judgement between Janusz and
Ludwik you can not do so by the end. So, Ludwik thinks kindly of
Janusz “… the odds had been stacked against us from the start: we
had no manual, no one to show us the way. Not one example of a happy
couple made up of boys. How were we supposed to know what to do? Did
we even believe that we deserved to get away with happiness?”
(p227)
That final question
seems to be running through so much at the moment (I am half way
through Matthew Todd’s Straight Jacket and it could so easily be a
quote from him too) – it is the flip side of coin from “Its a
Sin” which reminded us that too many gay men internalise a
narrative that they deserved AIDS.