In sharing this memoir Richard Coles resists the desire to tidy away grief – it seems to be an ever increasing pressure to be stoic in the face of lost loved one. A discrete tear at the funeral to signal that you are not heartless, but never show the uncontrolled, snot out the nose, sobbing that speaks out how you really feel.
Richard shares his deep love for David without flinching about the ways that David was far from perfect, far from easy to live with – that honesty makes the love all the more felt.
A big part of that honesty is to re-account David’s drinking – in many ways uncomfortably familiar… Thinking about why he drank Richard reflects:
“Perhaps this is also something to do with a need to palliate pain, in which gay men, nurses, and clergy are expert? There was something of self-medication in David’s drinking. When he was stressed, or anxious, or unsure of himself, drink was effective, in the short term at any rate, accessible, and socially acceptable. At least, it was until it became uncontrollable.
I think it was not only to self-medicate that David drank. Sometimes he drank vocationally, with a curiosity, and commitment, and dedication.” (p79)
The reasons are never simple, or singular, and that is often why it can be so very hard to break a cycle of drink – you need to simultaneously resist all the reasons at once, if just one of them escapes you the bottle is open again.
Some of his reflections on the invasion of Parish life into the personal are common to any clergy household, but some are particular, or at least intensified, by being a same-sex household – reading this as a companion to engaging with the Church of England’s Living in Love and Faith process only underlines the cruelty of the Church’s current position. That they were planning to get married in retirement, once the power of the Church over their lives was diminished is a plan shared, I assume, by many of the civilly-partnered clergy.
It is also a reflection on the changing season of life – the people we become as we grow older share only a certain amount in common with the young people we once were. Sometimes it is a blessing to have left behind much of the foolishness of youth, but there is a sorrow especially when we have to face that we have grown apart from those who helped shape us. He writes “I had always felt bad about this, life choices of necessity relegating former priorities, and I missed them, not only because I loved them, but because as you live on you realise we are not so much the authors of our lives but a library of other people.” (p135)
Written in the moment of loss there is an immediacy, as life goes on grief changes but does not go away – sometimes it will stab you with the guilt that you are getting along just fine without them, because what-else is there to do?