This is at times a mystifying collection of essays – these are academics soaked in Queer theory talking primarily to other academics equally soaked in theory and I felt much of it went over my head.
Some of the thinking about “queer” as a category pushed my thinking, it is not just about sexuality or gender identity – to be coded as “queer” can include most instances of othering.
In Rhiannon Graybill’s essay around consent they quote Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarsinha “I want to venture: What if some things aren’t fixable?What if some things really never will be the same – and that might not be great, but it might be okay?… What if some trauma wounds really never will go away – and we still might have great lives?” It feels that often there is a desire today to try and magic away trauma - that to live with your wounds is to be limited to being “victim” - but the resurrected Christ still had wounds – death was conquered but the wounds were carried. Is it glib to say that you can only be a survivor if you acknowledge the experiences you have survived.
Steed Vernyl Davidson offers the insight that “queerness serves as a useful tool in the politics of freedom precisely because social ordering benefits from difference” - which I read as saying when you get your elbows out and make a bit of new ground to be you it should not be a selfish act – in that clearing others will find the light to shine to.
In the second half of the collection the writers turned from the text of Jonah more to their own contexts, and this was enriching as for many of them that context is South Africa and the insights springing from that nation’s complex past contrast with our own. Some things familiar some in sharp relief to me.