First a big spoiler
alert – there are some big twists in the narrative therefore you
might not want to know what happens before you have read it...
This novel plays on
the contrast between two places, Oxford and Rhyl (known in our house
as “more cosmopolitan Rhyl” a phrase we picked up some years ago
from some TV programme or other...). There is intellectual Oxford and
earthy Rhyl, and Yori, with a grandparent from each of them, is pulled
between these two characteristics.
In the first part of
the novel you assume that Yori is a contemporary of Sara, whose body
is washed up during a storm which floods Rhyl. You learn about
Sara's disappearance as if it might have happened days before the
flood – but then in the second part it is revealed that there has
been an interval of 30 years (the flood is in 2040) between the two.
And then learn that Yori is not a contemporary stranger of her but in
fact Sara's grandson. But it is half way through the novels 400 pages
that you get to this – and it causes considerable confusion, I did
go back and check that I hadn't missed something obvious in the first
part to establish the relationships (of time, and of family) between
the different parts of the narrative – but no I think the confusion
was deliberate.
Sara is the strong
character of the first half of the novel – and her shadow and
absence are still felt in the second half – she is the flawed
genius, perhaps not a particular new character, but a skilfully
crafted one. She is also an alcoholic and I think her behaviours
around alcohol are really authentic - the little tricks of the trade
by which she is able to weave additional drinks “unnoticed” into her day are
familiar. This was not comfortable, in the same way that the book
Kicking the Black Mamba was not comfortable, too close to home –
and the fact that both the real Egan and the fictional Sara end up
drowning plays on my mind.
The closeness I felt
to Sara did leave the second half of the novel feeling a bit flat –
but it was about those still wrestling with her absence decades later
and so that flatness was, to over use a word, “authentic”. There
are lots of “true stories” told that don't speak half the truth
of this book.
No comments:
Post a Comment