Saturday, 26 November 2016

Conchie, What my Father didn't do in the War by Gethin Russell-Jones



There might be a concern that a Son writing the biography of his Father would tend towards hagiography, but Gethin paints a picture of his Father, John, that is honest about his weaknesses and flaws. That this is his second book following on from the account he co-authored with his Mother of her service at Bletchley Park.

That as fiancées one was a conscientious objector and the other a government code breaker can not have been entirely easy and yet it seems that it did not significantly impact on their relationship.

Out of the questions that Gethin, in writing the book, is clearly trying to work through is why his Father decided to formally register as a conscientious objector given as a student minister he was already exempt from military service. Such was his commitment to the pacifist essence of Christ's teaching that John felt compelled to make a public witness and actively reject military service and not simply rest passively on the exemption he already held.

Having made this public stand early in the war, during his studies his beliefs evolved, moving from a social gospel to a more “hard-line” Calvinist position – and there is a certain frustration in Gethin that despite this bold stand his Father did not continue as an activist, and indeed during his childhood his Father hardly spoke about being a pacifist.

But although the emphasis of John's belief shifted there is no suggestion that he actually rejected his pacifist or embraced militarism. There are pointers to him remaining a bit apart from his Calvinist colleagues – that he was not someone to adopt a “party's” beliefs as a package, but would form his own views on each matter. There is a “chicken and egg” question here, were his idiosyncratic beliefs the cause or consequence of him being a bit of a loner?

It is an engaging exploration of a man who, faced with the great tide of historical events, was prepared and able to stand up alone for his beliefs.

No comments:

Post a Comment