Other than the two
Outerspace sessions, which I had a hand in organising, my Greenbelt
was filled with music, most of it from the Canopy, but also some from
the Glade stage. I even failed to make my usual homage at the feet of
Padraig O Tuama.
There was a buzz around
the festival about Vicky Beeching – but I couldn't really join in
because I don't really know who she is (despite the fact that she
seems to be following me on twitter and, this is just a guess but, my
money is on the fact that she doesn't really know who I am either).
There was one point while I was looking after the Outerspace stall
when somebody was talking earnestly about the terrible things Vicky
had been through, and I had to resort to “nod and smile” tactics,
because it really didn't seem like the moment to mention that I
hadn't read her interview in the Independent, and so while I didn't
doubt her courage I didn't actually know what she had been courageous
about.
This is not a criticism
of Vicky Beeching (I mean the last thing I want to do is offend one
of my followers...) but that experience is indicative of the fact
that for all its talk of dialogue and diversity there is a lot of
“group-think” at Greenbelt. Greenbelt does provide “diversity”
by being different from other (Christian) festivals – but, for me
at least, it is less clear how wide the acceptable range of opinion
“within” Greenbelt actually is. I don't mind that
Greenbelt/Greenbelters have an agenda – I think I just get a little
weary of some of the self-congratulation based on the belief that
they don't.
I have never been one
to over do talks, one a day has always seemed plenty, but this year I
really struggled to find the motivation to hear anybody, I guess I had no
desire for “words”. Perhaps there is a tiredness, it must be 30
years since my first socio-political action when we took part in a
“Walk for the World” (and yes we did “get the T-Shirt”), one of my earliest memories is going to collect some stock from the local "Traidcraft Lady",
and while in absent minded moments I still find myself singing 1970s
protest songs if we are honest it was not peaceful women's songs
but the excess of its own insanity that defeated the Cold War. And so
somehow Greenbelt doesn't energise me with hope, I increasingly find
myself seeing Greenbelt not as a radical expression of the new
society but more as a soporific. It allows people to comfort
themselves that they do “care” without the need for fundamental
change or challenge to their lifestyle or society at large. There is
much spirited talk of anti-capitalism, but ultimately it is
consumerism that drives the festival. But I will not throw stones, I
am aware of my glass house – my life is lived far from the commune
or the peace-camp.
I also found myself
averse to the worship, and this was more troubling to me as I have
often been a bit of a worship junkie at Greenbelt. OK I have never
“done” the Greenbelt Communion – I have learnt to own the fact
that I don't worship in crowds, it is the mid-week Communion and the
8 O’clock that are my natural worshipping contexts. But too much of the
worship programme felt like it was primarily there as an opportunity
for the organisers to demonstrate how clever they were – little
seemed to create simple space for an encounter with God. I clearly
critique unfairly that which I did not participate in – I speak, perhaps, from a place of underlining alienation. I remain heartbroken
by the House of Bishops' Valentines message – what shocked me was
not that the Bishops could pronounce with such cruelty and/or stupidity
but that I cared. I thought I was long past caring about the
thoughts of Bishops, and yet they had created a barrier I couldn't
cross, getting off the bus that Sunday I turned away from the Church
and walked home. Living out the metaphor that “Home” and
“Church” lie in opposite directions was all too stark. I go now
but don't belong because I leave my vulnerability at home, and so I
am not open to the experience which makes it very hard for Jesus'
love to heal the wound.
No comments:
Post a Comment