It can be found on Amazon
I
was struck immediately by the title, An Honest Life, it is what I
seek to live, but it seems that it is not something the Church
actually supports. There have been moments when something other than
an “honest” existence has been attractive, and I am increasingly
troubled by, and for, my peers who seem to live within another state.
When
Geoffrey talked of the gay cliques at King's it rang bells with me –
not of my time at King's but afterwards when I was Chaplaincy
Assistant at Keele, I recall hanging out with two students who were
at that point in a closeted relationship with each other, so we made
up a little gang, where our sexuality, while still unspoken, was
acknowledged. There was a bond that came from this slightly illicit
gathering, that you were part of it. As an aside, one of the
Chaplains at Keele in order to try to move my exploration of vocation
on arranged for me to visit Staggers, it was fun (until the almighty
hang over from the gin), and one of the lessons I learnt was that
being gay was not a problem, as long as you managed it in the right
way.
While
at Keele I also learnt how complicated it is trying manage a closeted
life. I had come out back at Sixth Form, and as a student in Durham
and at King's I had an open and active involvement in both Christian
and gay scenes, without any real difficulties. Going to Keele the
gay side of life somehow took a back seat, although there were people
who knew I was gay, in part because my sister had been a student
there and so there were people around who knew her and knew her
brother was gay. But the experience of Keele, for me, was
claustrophobic and I increasingly see that a key cause of that was
living in the closet.
From
Keele I went on to Bishop Grosseteste in Lincoln and as I went deeper
into the formal exploration of vocation I found myself increasingly
distancing myself from gay life, well from those aspects of gay life
that might involve public acknowledgement – I didn't actually let
the dust settle on my Gaydar profile...
I am
not sure what the particular trigger was that made me take an
“honest” look at what I was doing – it was partly that I am
pretty rubbish at lying, I don't have the capacity to remember which
lies I have told which people, it is all too much hard work and even
after only a relatively few months of trying to juggle a “straight”
front I was exhausted by it – but there was a moment of clarity
when I saw the essential tragedy of so many of these “bachelor”
Priests, the lace and the gin are all well and good but there comes a
point when the brief encounters are not a substitute for love.
It
was clear to me that there were only two choices, even in Lincoln
with one of the most gay “friendly” Bishops, choices at least
until you had safely got through selection, or possibly training,
there was an idea that once you got a Dog Collar there might be more
freedom, although I think I realised that there would always be some
reason for deferring honesty, waiting till you had free-hold, waiting
for that new job offer, waiting till you had won the trust of the
parish...
Two
choices, follow my vocation or be open about my sexuality and hold on
to my sanity.
There
then followed a few moments of bridge burning to put my sexuality out
there, to irrevocably close the door of the closet from the outside -
perhaps a rather dramatic metaphor – I was not prancing down the
aisle of Lincoln Cathedral declaring my desires – no, it was little
acts, perhaps no one really noticed but they were important to me,
joining the local Changing Attitude group, going back to YLGC (Young
Lesbian and Gay Christians), having a boyfriend that I talked about.
And
I tried to find other routes to express the vocation, as the end of
my contract approached I applied for every chaplaincy post I could
find which didn't make ordination a prerequisite. There followed six
months of unemployment, living back home with my parents, and just at
the moment when I was start to acknowledge I was stuck in Chester and
should try to get a life there (and as I did I think there was even
the potential for a relationship with a lovely guy on horizon), God
decided the lesson in humility had been endured long enough, and an
admin job in Southampton was offered.
On
the first night in Southampton, as I got into the sleeping bag on the
floor of the hurriedly found, unfurnished, flat I will admit that I
was scared that this move was going to be a total disaster – but in
the days, weeks, years that have followed there have been so many
signs that have told me that this is where God has called me, placed
me. I am blessed with a full and stimulating life and a loving
relationship, but there are times when there is a yearning, there is
an unfilled hole left by that “abandoned” vocation (even if there
are probably a great deal more frequent times when I reflect that I
had a lucky escape).
Within
our parish we have experimented with lay worship leaders, but I had
to stand back from it because to be leading the people in worship
created a state of turmoil, a taste of a calling and yet only
underlining the void between me and the fullness of its expression.
I also find attending the ordinations of friends can be a little
painful, like the spurned ex-girlfriend at a wedding, I am on the
verge of standing at a vital moment and declaring “but it should
have been ME!”.
In
some ways I am thankful that Winchester has such a conservative
Bishop (I realise I am the only one) because it means that there is
no temptation toward compromise or collusion, the would be no
nudge-nudge, no supportive in private as long as you keep your head
down, keep it unofficial, and avoid speaking out against the Church.
There would only be a “no”. It a funny sort of way I take this as
one of the signs that I am in the right place.
But
there are others for whom I worry. There was a young man I knew
through the gay group in Durham, (my friends knew him as “Cute
Chad's Fresher”), and one Sunday I ended up sitting with him at the
Eucharist at the Cathedral and then going for coffee – over which
he talked about his “chosen profession” - which was a little
cryptic, but clearly ordination. He is now a priest, we are friends
on Facebook, although in reality only acquaintances (that coffee had,
in various ways, a more profound effect on me that is seems it had on
him), and so the content I see via Facebook is I assume for general
consumption, I am part of no inner circle – and so because I saw
his fancy dress outfit for the Pride Parade I imagine, at least in
theory, his Bishop saw it too.
But
there are others, some days my Facebook wall seems to be exclusively
made up of the antics of gay priests, and you are left wondering what
conclusion you are supposes to make, or not make, that their holiday
photos seems to always include that same “friend”.
It
is this group of my peers that troubles me, they must have been faced
with the same questions during the process of testing vocation as I
was, in many ways the vocation process has increasingly shone a spot
light on sexuality and therefore to be gay and pass through it
involves ever more gymnastics. This is a group that are making the
choice to play that game, in a way that I don't think is true for
earlier cohorts – those who were ordained when to be gay in society
generally require a certain amount of management of identity, when
the idea of same-sex marriage was a fantasy, or when Issues in Human
Sexuality was written and it's the authors thought the Church was on
a journey – and in its wake you might have thought any compromise
you had to make would have been temporary...
So
what do my cohort say about the value of “truth” in the Church, I
will admit I look on them with bitterness, their collusion is one of
the brakes on change. There are some that draw parallels between the
journey toward the ordination of women and the, open, ordination of
gay, lesbian, bi, etc. people. But the parallels collapse because the
pressure that forced the change for women was the witness of those
women would were called but not ordained banging on the door
demanding access. There are effectively no gay witnesses, they have
all slipped in through the door, and the last thing they will do is
raise their voice to demand access for others for fear that instead
they will be ejected. Their collusion is what ensures the continuing
denial of honesty in the Church.
But
I also worry about them as people, what is life really like for them,
I might at times throw stones that they are having their cake and
eating it – but are they, I somehow doubt it. I think there is
rather more cake on my side of the fence. How do we make a different
kind of Church that would allow them an honest life without wreaking
their existence in the process? Maybe it is all omelettes and broken
eggs. My trouble is that I am not really an activist, I am not one to
man the barricades, I prefer to quietly get on with living my own
life but I still hold these worries in my heart as I struggle to do
anything about them.