This is the
Archaeological Monograph of the recovery and identification of a
group of soldiers who fought in the Battle of Fromelles in 1916. As
such it is a formal and academic publication rather than a “popular”
account.
The application of
Archaeological methods to what is in Archaeological term a recent set
of remains is interesting, as it the ways that techniques used in the
recovery of mass graves as part of investigations of war crimes are
applied to what is from that sphere a more historic setting.
But perhaps the most
interesting aspect is that the project was undertaken at all – it
is made very clear that the primary aim is to provide identification
before reburial (in a newly created war cemetery) of as many of the
soldiers as possible. And other historical or archaeological
research goals are only addressed to the extent that relevant
information is provided by this primary aim.
But why 90 years
after the battle did the Australian Army feel the need to expend such
resources on the identification – all those involved would have
been presumed dead, (for most the Germans had collected identifying
articles from the fallen soldiers at the time, therefore their death
had been confirmed even if their bodies had not been located at again
at the end of the war) - what was the benefit this late in the day of
providing a new burial?
It is clear that
although in many ways distant the First World War remains present –
the Centenary has brought it to the forefront of many minds, but it
was never really that far from our thoughts. There must now be few
sons and daughters of the Fallen, but there are still relations who
are conscious of a loss – and perhaps the feeling of loss endures
all the more for those who mourned one whose body was not found. For
the Australian families even of those who had an identified grave the
idea of visiting it must until the last couple of decades have been
remote – yet was there a comfort in knowing it was there, a comfort
denied those for whom there was no grave.
And so fresh graves
and restored identifies were provided.
One of the oddities,
given the project was all about identification, was that this
monograph treats all the findings with anonymity – in part because
the process of formal confirmation of the identities was ongoing at
the time of writing, but also because there seemed to be the
application of the same standards of confidentiality to the medical
histories of the soldiers as would be afforded to a living
individual.
No comments:
Post a Comment