The centenary of the
First World War is clearly prompting a flood of new books, each
trying to find a fresh angle on those events, and I am sure the White
would be unapologetic for joining that bandwagon.
The “Home Front”
is well remembered in the Second World War, seen in particular
through London's experience of the Blitz, indeed I would think for
many the first images that would come to mind on mention of that War
would be scenes of the Blitz. Events on the “Home Front” during
the First World War are relatively speaking overlooked – in part
due to being overshadowed by the similar but more intense events of
the Second war, but also because for the First World War it is the
“memory” of the trenches that is the defining one.
So what do we learn
from White of the experiences of Londoners during the First World
War?
First we learn of
the intense divide within society, between the ruling elite and the
working classes – and the essential fear the ruling class had of
the masses – it is a Dickensian picture. Many less than helpful
decisions can be “explained” by this dynamic which sought to
control and pacify the supposedly brutish and uncivilised masses.
The restrictions of the consumption of alcohol being just one example
– how much of our continuing poor relationship with alcohol was
born in these years, you had to drink fast because the pub was
shutting soon?
The second, and
perhaps closely linked to the first, is that the War forced a rapid
increase in the involvement of “the Sate” in the organisation of
society. It is now that the structures that would become the
“Welfare State”, and allow the large scale nationalisation of
industry, during and after the Second World War were born. But that
birth was a painful and faltering one. The laissez faire approach
that had dominated Victorian Britain is forced, often kicking and
screaming, into retreat.
We also learn that
despite some of the weaknesses in the measures adopted the War was
actually, generally, a time of social improvement – mainly as a
simple result of the reduced supply of labour, which acted to force
the wages of the lowest rungs of society upwards, but also, and more
significantly, gave these people greater consistency / security in
employment. While these gains were not universally maintained in the
post-war years, due to demobilisation and then the depression, there
is a feeling that the very worst excesses of “Dickensian” poverty
were permanently banished from London during the War.
While this is not a
book of earth shattering revelations it is well written and
insightful, and it tells a much bigger story about the evolution of
British society than simply a tale of the war years.
No comments:
Post a Comment