Of the books about
worship I have recently read this was by far the most interesting,
because despite the rhetoric of the others this was the only one that
actually engages with “ordinary” peoples faith and practice.
Manalo's, writing in
an USA Roman Catholic context, starting point is concern that since
Vatican II the emphasis on the people's participation in the Mass has
also devalued and marginalised a range on other formal and informal
liturgical practices.
He takes the term
Liturgy of Life from Peter C. Phan who defined it as the “universal
experiences of God and mystical encounters with God's grace in the
midst of everyday” - which prompts Manalo to realise that “the
Eucharist is not so much the source and centre of my life or the
church's life; God is.” This might seem blindingly obvious, yet how
much of the church's practice denies this truth. As someone coming
firmly from a Eucharistic tradition, who will find every reason to
oppose the introduction of a non-Eucharistic service, I have for a
number of years had this itch that using the Eucharist as the
metaphor for every Christian activity is unhelpful.
He points out that
“There is a general assumption that individuals commit ' to an
entire, single package of beliefs and practices of an official
religion,' when, in fact, many people come to negotiate a variety of
religious and spiritual practices...” - how many people have you
meet who explain that they would like to be a Christian but they
can't believe in such and such random dogma – and you are like -
OMG you think any of us believe that? I often find that those outside
the church take our doctrines far more seriously than we ourselves
ever would do.
But Manalo is also
helpful in pointing to the ways in which there are a whole range of
“religious” practices that are not directly related to going to
church, and therefore the assumption that the decline in church
attendance also marks a decline in religious disposition / an
increase in rationality is without foundation.
I go to church
because of my faith, I don't have faith because I go to church. But
one of the wisest thinks I have read is Manalo's quote from Irene
Duller, a born and bred but perhaps is many people's eye border-line
lapsed catholic, she defines 'church' as “a place that you know God
is there. While God can be everywhere, sometimes I'm not present. So
it's kind of like that calibration: I'm here; God's here. God is
everywhere but sometimes you need to be present to actually feel it.
But I think factually, God is everywhere. You could find God
anywhere.”
You could find God
anywhere, but generally you don't – you need something to frame the
encounter, to make you pay attention. The Eucharist is a powerful
opportunity for encounter with the Lord, but it is not unique, just
as Thomas and Paul had authentic but totally distinct encounters with
the risen Lord, so the Eucharist is only one form of encounter.
Never let us think that our Tabernacles can contain out God, he who
burst from the tomb knows no boundaries – every-time we set a limit
on his love he burst out and expanses our imagination.
One of the people
Manalo interviews is Helen Rosario, (key stats, 87, widow, Filipina)
whose house is full of icons – and I if I can work out how to add
pictures to this blog, I will show you that I am not so far behind...
No comments:
Post a Comment